Legislature(1997 - 1998)

03/21/1998 10:07 AM House STA

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
HB 462 - USE OF STATE MONEY FOR IMAGES/MESSAGES                                
                                                                               
Number 0190                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES announced the next order of business was HB 462, "An               
Act relating to the contents of certain state documents," sponsored            
by Representative Therriault.  She said she would entertain a                  
motion to adopt the proposed committee substitute.                             
                                                                               
Number 0208                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE IVAN IVAN made a motion to adopt the proposed                   
committee substitute for HB 462, Version 0-LS1527\H, Bannister,                
3/20/98, for consideration.  There being no objection, it was so               
adopted.                                                                       
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES called on Representative Gene Therriault, sponsor of               
the bill to testify.                                                           
                                                                               
Number 0217                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE GENE THERRIAULT, sponsor, Alaska State Legislature,             
stated the changes primarily dropped the restriction on placing a              
message and photo to cover only those who hold an elected state                
office.  Agency personnel would be able to put information on the              
longevity bonus check stub, for example.  Information on the                   
dividend application about the program would be appropriate, if                
signed by the commissioner or director of the program.  Section                
1(b) reads, "A state agency may not place a message on or with an              
application form, a warrant, or a direct deposit notice provided by            
the agency unless the message is (1) from a state agency employee              
who is not an elected state official; and (2) required by law,                 
necessary for the operation of the document, related to seasonal               
health issues including flu shot reminders, or limited to stating              
the requirements or deadlines of a program or activity of a state              
agency."  The wording was changed so that clearly on the longevity             
bonus check stub there could be information about the deadline for             
the permanent fund dividend, for example.  He did not want to                  
preclude that from happening.  The definitions in the rest of the              
bill remain the same.                                                          
                                                                               
Number 0251                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE BERKOWITZ stated there is no effective date for the             
bill.  He wondered whether there is anything in the "hopper" that              
would violate the bill.                                                        
                                                                               
Number 0257                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT stated certainly the next permanent fund             
dividend applications are far enough away that they would not be at            
the print shop now.  There might be a problem with the longevity               
bonus check stubs, however.  An immediate effective date isn't                 
necessary, if it would cause some problems with the things in the              
works already.                                                                 
                                                                               
Number 0265                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES stated anything started before an effective date would             
be precluded, unless there was time to change it.  If something had            
already gone to print before the effective date, it wouldn't be                
affected.                                                                      
                                                                               
Number 0276                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT stated it is up to the committee to                  
decide if a specific effective date is necessary.  It might be up              
to what the Administration says in terms of what it has in the                 
"hopper," and what type of time line would be needed in order to               
change any kind of document in the works.                                      
                                                                               
Number 0281                                                                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES stated no one from the Administration is here, except              
for Nanci Jones from the Permanent Fund Dividend Division.                     
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT stated Pat Pourchot from the Office of               
the Governor spoke to him about the bill and expressed that the                
Administration thought it might be an encroachment on their basic              
powers.  It was a pleasant conversation, but there was a difference            
in points of view.  "Certainly, the legislative branch, the                    
Administration has money budgeted to get their message out.  But,              
we don't do that on regular, programmatic documents.  And I think              
the -- part of the problem is that you start politicizing those                
documents and those programs.  And there are other means to get                
your message out and I really don't think that we should allow that            
kind of information to be placed on these documents."                          
                                                                               
Number 0302                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE KIM ELTON stated, in reference to the timing, the               
bill speaks more to when a document is printed rather than when it             
would be distributed.  It seems, therefore, that there would not be            
a problem with the effective date.  Documents prepared up until the            
time of the effective date would not be affected.                              
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES stated that would be her read too.  She called on Nanci            
Jones from the Permanent Fund Dividend Division, Department of                 
Revenue, to testify.                                                           
                                                                               
Number 0316                                                                    
                                                                               
NANCI JONES, Director, Permanent Fund Dividend Division, Department            
of Revenue, testified in reference to the printing of the longevity            
bonuses, retirement and benefit checks, permanent fund dividend                
checks, and payroll checks stating they all try to buy warrant                 
stocks together.  Each has something different printed on the top              
of the warrant.  "There might be a place where we would have to                
destroy whatever we had in order to buy new stock."  She is not                
sure about the intricacies of the longevity bonus mentioned                    
earlier.  The booklet does not go to print until late fall.                    
                                                                               
CHAIR JAMES entertained a motion to move the bill out of the                   
committee.                                                                     
                                                                               
Number 0332                                                                    
                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE IVAN made a motion to move the proposed committee               
substitute for HB 462, Version 0-LS1527\H, Bannister, 3/20/98, from            
the committee with individual recommendations and the attached                 
fiscal note(s).  There being no objection, CSHB 462(STA) was so                
moved from the House State Affairs Standing Committee.                         
                                                                               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects